Lapilanders Casino in casino blog articles

#3590 ranked with 40/100

Lapilanders Casino rating calculation

Rank parameter	Estimated value
Registration, licensing, certification
Registration procedure	52.565
Community engagement (support, representative, ADR)	90.17
Fairness of T&C	90
Compliance with own T&C	100
Payment stability	180
Licensing (number of licenses, regulator authority)	180
Operator authority	7
Brand age	42
Certification	0.08
Country restrictions	1.16
Support
Self-exclusion	0.02
Live chat	50
Feedback form	0.07
E-mail	23
Phone	0.05
Messengers	0.07
Postal address	25
Support working hours	90
Software & platforms
Language adaptation	21.456
Casino client variety	71.77
Platform rating	0
Software rating	65.72
Games portfolio	92.97
Original software (no scripts)	90
Finance
Currencies	42.28
Deposit methods	22.01
Withdrawal methods	24.35
Verification	0.07
Weekend payouts	90
Withdrawal hold	0.09
Minimum deposit	0.47
Minimum withdrawal	0.28
Withdrawal limits	1.19
Withdrawal request processing time	0.48
E-wallets payout time	3.38
Cards payout time	0.53
Bank payout time	0.15
Bonuses
Bonus update frequency and quality	65.175
Other
Additional services	70
Cryptocurrency support	0.01
Social factors
Social factors	2.07
Adjustments
Whitelist bonus coefficient	80
Totals
Auto Rating System total	1675.64
Average assessor score	0
Average user score	53
Overall final score	1728.64

Calculation method

To review

Registration and Licensing

The principle of giving the best ratings to different licenses is reputation, attitude to the problems of players. The middle category (grade 5) is normal governments of normal countries, most likely everything is ok. But casinos with such licenses are units, the majority accept players only of their own country => score five. Anything below is very weak in all respects.

United Kingdom, Isle of Man, Alderney = 10

States of Jersey, Kahnawake = 9 and 8

Malta, Gibraltar, Estonia = 7

Nevada = 6

Germany, Italy, France, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Ireland, Austria, Belize, Spain = 5

Curacao, New Zealand = 4

The rest of the section Jurisdictions = 3

Non-gambling license / No license = 1

Soft / RTP (% return)

Authority and quality of software + the fact of licensing the software manufacturer itself in a reliable jurisdiction + Number of software in a casino.

Microgaming, NetEnt = 10

Novomatic, Cryptologic, IGT = 9

Betsoft = 8

PlayTech, WMS = 7

RTG, Rival, Rival = 6

MegaJack, Chartwell, Random Logic = 4

Fake or No license ( even if there are official software) = 1

Honesty and reliability

Casino administration behavior in the whole: the observance of the stated Regulations, all sorts of policies and T&C.

Cash / Bank and Payment time

Quantity and quality of payment systems. Min and max limits. Payment terms.

Design and usability

The possibility of intuitive and simple use of the casino in the whole.

Bonuses and Promotions

Availability, quality and quantity of bonuses, bonus policy; additional incentives to players.

Quality support service

Quality of support work: the availability of online chat, Skype, speed, completeness and clarity of response to messages.

Rating ARS

To review

Suggest an edit

Compare

Casino Rank

1 729

Reviews

Discussions

Bonuses

Slots

5486

Softs

Representative on site

Dispute mediator

Overview Complaints Bonuses Slots Reviews Discussions FAQs Events

Restricted in your location

Lapilanders Casino is prohibited in your country

Self-exclusion issues

Self-exclusion is either not implemented at all, or its process is severely and inadequately complicated (on one hand the player cannot self-limit in a single click, and on the other hand unlocking happens after the first request to support).

Rating ARS

40.1% ^(#3590)

Player Ratings

53% ⁽¹⁾

Opinion Rating

0 ⁽⁾

Dynamics of assessments

Calculation details

Calculation method

Lapilanders Casino

Sorry, no results were found.

Lapilanders Casino News & Events in blogs and articles

Lapilanders Casino ratings among players and experts rating in 2026

News, events, articles